NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Beneath the rugged face of Mount Alvand near the religious city of Qom lies the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant—an underground stronghold and centerpiece of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Though presented as a civilian facility, Fordow is widely believed by Israeli intelligence to be the probable heart of Tehran’s covert atomic weapons effort.
For years, the Islamic Republic has played a dangerous game—enriching uranium just below weapons-grade, obstructing International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) oversight, and using regional instability as a shield for its ambitions. While Israel has confronted nuclear threats before, it lacks the bunker-busting capability to neutralize Fordow. That responsibility now falls to the United States. The case for destroying Fordow is not only strong—it is urgent.
Fordow: The Core of Iran’s Nuclear Calculus
Iran’s nuclear infrastructure includes various sites: Natanz, which is more exposed; Arak, partly repurposed; and Esfahan and Parchin, both key research locations. But Fordow stands apart. It is buried under nearly 80 meters of rock and hosts advanced IR-6 centrifuges capable of enriching uranium at accelerated rates. The site is engineered to survive conventional airstrikes and represents Iran’s strategic bet on invulnerability.
ONLY THE US MILITARY CAN TAKE OUT IRAN’S ‘MOST DANGEROUS’ NUCLEAR SITE
Western intelligence exposed Fordow in 2009 after years of concealment. Prime Minister Netanyahu warned that Iran’s leaders “have backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a nuclear weapons program,” and cautioned, “if not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time. It could be a year. It could be within a few months, less than a year.” While he told Business Insider that Israel’s strike hit “the core of Iran’s nuclear weaponization infrastructure,” he acknowledged that Israel “lacks the heavy bunker-busting munitions” needed to destroy sites like Fordow.
Fordow is not just another enrichment site—it is a fortified monument to Iran’s deception and determination. The United States alone has the tools and reach to destroy it.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi confirmed in 2024 that Iran now possesses enough uranium enriched to 60%—a technical heartbeat away from weapons-grade levels—to build several nuclear devices. He warned that the IAEA lacked sufficient transparency in Iran’s nuclear activities and cautioned that “without full Iranian cooperation, the agency cannot verify that its program is peaceful.”
A Pattern of Deception—and Alarm
In 2018, Mossad operatives seized 55,000 documents from a Tehran warehouse revealing a covert nuclear weapons program known as “Project Amad.” David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security assessed the material as “clear evidence that Iran intended to produce five nuclear weapons.”
IAEA CHIEF CALLS ISRAELI PRESIDENT, REPORTEDLY SAYS IRAN NUCLEAR FACILITY WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED
Despite the JCPOA framework, Iran continues nuclear-related activity at undeclared sites—Turquzabad, Marivan, and Varamin—where IAEA inspectors have found traces of nuclear material without explanation. These discoveries point to a sustained weapons agenda.
In 2023, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi warned that “negative developments regarding Iran’s nuclear program” could compel Israel to act. His predecessor, Lt. Gen. Aviv Kochavi, was more blunt: “Iran today has enough enriched material to produce four nuclear bombs, three at 20 percent and one at 60 percent.”
Despite the threat, Israel cannot strike Fordow effectively. As Israeli Ambassador Yechiel Leiter admitted, “We may be able to strike Natanz, but we cannot reach Fordow without American support.”
How the U.S. Would Strike—and Why It Must
The U.S. military possesses the capability to neutralize Fordow. The GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)—a 30,000-pound bunker-buster—is designed for hardened targets like Fordow. Dropped from a B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, it can penetrate 60 feet of reinforced concrete or hundreds of feet of soil and rock. Multiple MOPs delivered in a precision, double-tap pattern could collapse Fordow’s structure entirely.
A strike package would likely include:
- Stealth B-2 bomber infiltration from bases such as Whiteman AFB or Diego Garcia;
- Electronic suppression of Iranian air defenses;
- Real-time satellite and drone ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance);
- Follow-on cruise missile strikes as necessary.
But the mission cannot stop at detonation. The United States must insist on independent verification that Fordow is irreparably disabled. This could include IAEA inspection—if permitted—or the use of American intelligence capabilities to gather imagery, seismic data, and on-ground confirmation. A successful strike means little unless the world can verify the result.
Osirak Revisited: Lessons from 1981
In 1981, Israel destroyed Iraq’s Osirak reactor in Operation Opera. Then-Prime Minister Menachem Begin stated, “Never again will we allow an enemy to develop weapons of mass destruction against the Jewish people.” Although initially condemned, the strike was later vindicated when the Gulf War revealed Saddam Hussein’s persistent nuclear ambitions.
TRUMP FACES CRITICAL DECISION AS MIDDLE EAST TEETERS ON BRINK OF WAR
The U.S. now stands where Israel once stood—facing a critical threat with limited time. Delay may allow Iran to build a bomb, fortify alternative sites, or export nuclear know-how to its proxies in Lebanon, Syria, or Yemen.
What If We Don’t Strike?
Opponents of military action argue it could spark a regional war, drive up oil prices, or embolden Iran’s hardliners. Those are serious risks—but not greater than allowing a fanatical regime to field nuclear weapons. Iran has already threatened retaliation, but its escalation capacity is checked by economic fragility, internal dissent, and the specter of overwhelming U.S. retaliation.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
As Henry Kissinger once observed, “The classical notion of deterrence was that there was some consequence before which aggressors and evildoers would recoil.” Deterrence must be credible—and credibility, at times, requires action.
Failure to act would embolden other nuclear aspirants. From North Korea to China, rogue regimes are watching. A nuclear Iran would almost certainly provoke proliferation across the Middle East, triggering a regional arms race with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt.
The Cost of Inaction
Striking Fordow will not erase Iran’s nuclear knowledge. But it will cripple its most secure facility, set the program back years, and signal that the U.S. will act when global stability is on the line. The alternative is a future where Iran detonates a bomb in secret and confronts the world from a position of strength—and impunity.
That scenario would force the U.S. into a larger and bloodier war; one fought under the shadow of a nuclear threat.
Conclusion
Fordow is not just another enrichment site—it is a fortified monument to Iran’s deception and determination. The United States alone has the tools and reach to destroy it. This mission, if undertaken, must be precise, overwhelming, and independently verified.
The clock is ticking. Each month Iran delays inspection, each trace of material found at an undeclared site, each rhetorical threat, inches us closer to the point of no return.
History will judge our resolve. Let it be said that when the mountain hid the bomb, America shattered the mountain—and proved it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ROBERT MAGINNIS
Read the full article here
